AI-Native Powerby Rafael Collado

The portfolio

What I am working on.

Projects in converter design, engineering automation and machine learning. Open a project to see how it works and what its results can tell you.

New to AI? Try the first lesson →

Published work

Engineering work you can read at its original source.

PublishedPublished Work

8 Steps to Designing an LLC Resonant Converter

A practical map of the eight dependent decisions in an LLC resonant converter design.

DecisionCheck whether specifications, definitions, selected components, operating range, and stress calculations form one traceable design chain.

What existsA primary EEPower article under Rafael Collado's byline documents the eight-step method; this site adds a review map that preserves its dependencies.

LimitA worked design method is not project-specific design approval or hardware validation.

Read project

Research and prototypes

What I am building, what has been tested, and what remains to be done.

Simulation-only researchFault-triage research

Simulation-Only Flyback Fault Triage

A research workflow that turns simulated flyback evidence into a traceable next simulation check.

DecisionDecide which additional simulation check can separate competing explanations, or whether the simulated evidence is too weak to continue.

What existsDefined a simulation-only evidence-to-next-check contract; no hardware diagnostic tool or validated model is claimed.

LimitNo hardware measurements, bench validation, safe-measurement guidance, or transfer from simulated cases to physical converters.

Read project
ResearchSurrogate Models

Magnetic Surrogates: When to Use, Warn, or Abstain

An evaluation contract for deciding when a fast magnetic estimate may be used, warned, escalated, or refused.

DecisionChoose use, warn, request higher fidelity, or abstain according to the available evidence.

What existsDefined a public evaluation contract for baselines, grouped validation, residuals, unfamiliar inputs, and abstention.

LimitNo trained model, benchmark, public dataset, project-specific threshold, or hardware validation is presented.

Read project
ResearchKnowledge Systems

When a Technical RAG Should Answer, Ask, or Escalate

A prototype specification for deciding whether approved documentation supports an answer, needs more context, or requires expert review.

DecisionChoose answer with citations, ask for missing context, or escalate to expert review.

What existsSpecified a three-route answerability workflow and its evaluation plan; no implemented system or accuracy result is claimed.

LimitNo public approved-source corpus, benchmark, freshness guarantee, production system, or replacement for expert review is presented.

Read project